Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Gay Rebel, Indeed


For me flesh is a vessel . . . I frequently find myself shifting fluidly, engendering the masculine in one breath and the feminine in the next. At the time it occurs naturally, and yet in retrospect, it strikes me with confusion and concern, because certainly no one else transmutates quite as I do. I feel alone, alienated by my differentness, alone even among my most inclusive friends. I am struck by the conviction that, more than anything else, I wish I were a shape-changer, able to shed one sex in favor of the opposite, only to exchange them again the day succeeding.

Above, I've provided an excerpt from a journal I've kept quite private for sometime. Six months after coming out, I entered into a new crisis of identity, having found a trap door in the floor of my closet. Gender fluidity. A nasty little curse. Not inverted enough to be transexual, not convicted enough to be transgendered, just a girl who likes girls and wakes up somedays feeling like a boy—and who's a girl again by sundown. I spent months in dark confusion before I learned to tread the ebb and flow, collecting my ying and overabundant yang into a gimpy rhythm.

But I don't offer these intimate details for nothing. I lay them out here as justification for ignoring the vast majority of Richard Bruce Nugent's selected works, focusing instead on the tiny, eight-lined poem tucked away beneath his prolific piece, “Smoke, Lilies, and Jade.” Fittingly entitled , Nugent's “Narcissus,” caught me full in the chest, it's beautiful androgyny pouring two stanzas-worth of validation over my pinched psyche. Nugent understands. Echo's “double sexed smile” I've seen in the mirror, as “male into female seemed to flow.” The idea of male within female and female within male is boldly illustrated. Gay rebel indeed. I was not expecting to relate, since I am the the quiet antithesis to everything that Nugent stands for as an author—brave, black, male lover of men. But my throat closed at his tender illustration of Narcissus' mythical nymph, his careful treatment of gender fluidity.

As a piece, I found this poem most interesting for it's petite, gem-like quality. So succinct and feminine, yet not homoerotic. It lends me some confidence in the bisexual themes featured in “Smoke, Lilies, and Jade,” where Freudian subtext and overt homoeroticism are challenged by Alex's love for Melva. Having always been guiltily prejudicial of male bisexuality myself, I struggled to accept Alex's professed duality of affection, but “Narcissus” dashed my skepticism. I feel Nugent challenging his reader to crack open a turgid can of worms, one I myself would care much more to bury. Oddly, though not expecting to be taken by his work, I have adopted Nugent as an artist of interest, despite our inherent differences as people—or perhaps in spite of them.

10 comments:

  1. Your interpretation of the poem is quite interesting. I think it's wonderful how you found a way to relate it to you despite, as you stated, all the differences you share with the author. I found the transcript from your personal journal to be a beautiful read and that's something that I;m sure many gay men and women experience, that questioning of gender roles. And the way that you describe it is with a grace that allows even those of us who haven't a vivid insight to the feelings it arouses. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I too liked how you were able to relate the poem to yourself and found your personal journal to be quite poetic. I would argue that your willingness to share such deep, personal feelings with our class is very brave. The fluidity of sexuality and the oneness of genders which Nugent speaks of highlights our ability and right to see what we want within ourselves. Nugent seems to find beauty in the awareness of different aspects of one's self.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Olivia, you definitely blew me away with this blog post. I really don't mean to echo what Kelsea and Mike said before me, but seriously it was very well done and bravo on your part for sharing such an intimate story. I also have friends within my life going through the same exact experience that you did, and I can't believe how I glanced over Narcissus really quickly, almost in a hurry, and you pulled so much from it. Just as Nugent's symbolic "Blue Smoke" paints a picture for us all to see, so too did you help us understand the gender fluidity and what it truly means to be walking the line with such grace.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, I'm just going to go out and say it: wow. I mean, seriously, Olivia, your insight was beautiful. The way you interpreted those two stanzas by intertwining your own personal experience with gender fluidity...again, wow. As Kelsey mentioned, you have painted a picture that reflects so honestly your struggles, but also inspires much empathy as you are not alone in feeling this way. It's a confusion that many people have dealt with or are dealing with, and I think your journal excerpt creates a sort of bridge for your reader between reading and identifying.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nugent is a man after my own heart and I believe you've explained why beautifully. He's more than just a man who spoke of his desire, but had insight to the fluidity of gender and self. I really appreciate your choice of piece to speak of, too, since it was a thing in passing. It deserves a better look in itself and adds to the rest of Nugent's work. Since the article mentioned his art, I went online to see what it might compliment. He has a beautiful style, some whimsical, others more stern. I found the same type of fluidity, interest proposed by you in them. And aside from that, it's pretty spiffy. I think you'd all like it or at least appreciate it. Just note there he has some pieces depicting less than appropriate exploits! http://www.brucenugent.com/Portal.htm

    ReplyDelete
  6. Because I hate to read for class, I really appreciate Olivia making the reading more personable. Reading as I have too as opposed to understanding it is something I have come to appreciate while being a college student taking into account people's various lifestyles. The notion of being torn between loving to sexes is something I find of interest because I identify a lot of my friends being bisexual as opposed to just either being gay or straight. And like others before, I have never really been a fan of the notion of bisexuality. However, Nugent makes me rethink what is is to be beautiful and who it is to be beautiful, which I think is a beautiful thing! I feel as though with some aspects maybe everyone should aspire to be more like Nugent with his aspect of beauty and what it means.

    ReplyDelete
  7. At first I found the structure of Nugent's work pretty annoying, but I came to think of it as his state of frustration and anxiety. Each stanza or as Olivia regarded as' little poems' constitutes sort of independent scenes he encounters in every lives. I quite couldn't catch the tone of his voice but rather understand now that he unwillingly jettisons burdens on his distasteful feelings toward gender disparity. The underlying theme of confusion of a boy trapped in a body of a girl like Oliva's case very much shares a lot of sympathy. I appreciate how much Olivia can relate her life to Nugent's.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with Lim...it is really frustrating...to not be given any kind of structure...with which to interpret the text...After all...even...slight changes in punctuation...can dramatically alter the reader's interpretation...However...I am also...very fascinated that despite the jumbled nature of "Smoke, Lillies and Jade"...we are still able to decode what Nugent wants...us to understand.
    I am also very proud of Olivia for being so open and finding her own home within the text...I have never been a part of a class...where the students were so...invested in the readings and discussions...and...I...really...appreciate...that...we...have...established...a 'safe' environment to share our thoughts and ideas in. Gah that's annoying!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I have to jump on this marvelous bandwagon as well and commend Olivia for a rather fearless insight into her most intimate thoughts. Going off of that, I must say that I have always been hyper-aware of the level of masculinity that I chose to (or am able to) emit on a regular basis. I feel like there is a frighteningly tangible spectrum in the GLBT community (or at least for me personally, being gay) that places homosexuals at a higher status based on whether or not they can conform to their gender roles, and to what degree they do so. It's saddening to me; shouldn't acceptance be a "Yes" or a "No", regardless of the small details? I have reached an understanding that, while most people DO accept my sexuality, they often criticize my level of masculinity, and THAT puts your head on the chopping block.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I admire the fact that Olivia posted something so personal, she not only gives us a glimpse into her life, she's giving us an example of how to critically connect to an authors writing. Which for this class, I feel to be really important. With that said, I commend every aspect of Olivia's writing and the connections she formed with Nugent's writing even though she didn't fully agree or connect to it fully she found a way to turn the tides and pull out something more than "just a reading". This blog Post game me more to think about, Olivia's interpretation combined with her personal experience left me mesmerized.

    ReplyDelete